你刚刷到这条消息，本来准备顺手划走，但又怕自己错过了真正会影响下一步判断的那一点。
最容易做错的，是GPT-5.6: Frontier intelligence that scales with your ambition；代价往往是如果只盯表面热闹，你很容易在错误方向上花掉时间、预算和注意力。；我先给一个保守判断：提示词肥胖，正在吃掉 GPT-5.6。
You see "GPT-5.6: Frontier intelligence that scales with your ambition" in your feed, almost scroll past, then stop because you're worried the real takeaway might change what you do next. My conservative read: prompt bloat is eating GPT-5.6. I would cut half the prompt before I changed the model.
That is the useful reversal in the GPT-5.6 guidance. The starting move is not "add more rules." It is start with a minimal prompt and the fewest tools. Old templates, stale context, and oversized tool definitions slow the model down, raise cost, and push it into unnecessary exploration.
The detail I would not ignore is wording sensitivity. GPT-5.6 is called out as more sensitive to generic instructions like "Be concise" or "Keep it short." A cleanup pass is not just about shorter prompts. It can improve completeness by removing vague pressure that makes the model over-compress.
This is not an argument for vague prompts. It is an argument for lighter prompts with a clear task structure. And it is based on the latest-model guidance, not a hardware benchmark or a repo-level A/B test.
An update is worth following only if it changes your next decision, not because it ships a longer feature list. If you're moving to GPT-5.6 this week, delete something before you add anything: repeated rules, old context blocks, or oversized tool definitions. Share this with the person who still thinks better models need fatter prompts first.
真正该讨论的是：GPT-5.6: Frontier intelligence that scales with your ambition