你刚刷到这条消息，本来准备顺手划走，但又怕自己错过了真正会影响下一步判断的那一点。
最容易做错的，是calesthio / OpenMontage；代价往往是如果只盯表面热闹，你很容易在错误方向上花掉时间、预算和注意力。；我先给一个保守判断：AI视频下半场，是把IDE变成片场。。
You see calesthio / OpenMontage in your feed, almost scroll past, then pause because the real risk is spending the next month chasing the wrong thing.
The easiest wrong call is to treat every open AI video project like a cheaper Sora. That is how people waste time, budget, and attention on the loudest layer instead of the layer that actually changes the 工作流程（workflow）.
My conservative read: AI video's second half is turning the IDE, the coding workspace, into a film set.
The repo homepage is the giveaway. OpenMontage calls itself an "agentic video production system," not a video model and not a clip editor. The architecture doc makes the bet even clearer: there is "no runtime Python orchestrator"; the agent is the control plane, while Python is kept for tools and persistence. In plain English, the assistant is meant to handle research, scripting, review, rollback, and cost choices, while models become parts in a bigger production pipeline.
That is why "open-source Sora" is the wrong frame. A tool update is worth tracking only if it changes your next decision. This one shifts the question from "which model is strongest?
真正该讨论的是：calesthio / OpenMontage